Federal lawsuit for immediate discontinuation of COVID vaccines
America’s Frontline Doctors has filed a motion to stop the use of COVID vaccines for emergency use for anyone under the age of 18, anyone who has already had the so-called virus and has built up natural immunity AND anyone who has not been given all the honest data about the side effects and lethality of the vaccine before the injection. Also, the people who get injected often don’t know that the vaccine, which in reality is not a vaccine, is not FDA approved.
This information is being withheld worldwide from people who are being injected with this spike-protein.
- There is no emergency, which is a condition for issuing EUA and EUA renewals for COVID vaccines.
- There is “no serious or life-threatening disease or condition.”
- Vaccines do not diagnose, treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2 or COVID.
- Known and potential risks of the vaccine outweigh their known and potential benefits.
- There are adequate, approved, and available alternatives to vaccines.
- Health care professionals and vaccine candidates are not adequately informed.
America’s Frontline Doctors heeft een motie ingediend om het gebruik van de Emergency Use Authorization COVID vaccins te stoppen voor iedereen onder de 18, iedereen met natuurlijke immuniteit of iedereen die geen geïnformeerde toestemming heeft gekregen. https://t.co/SBuL4BV9lR
– Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) 21 juli 2021
The authors of the motion attached a statement from a whistleblower who came forward claiming that deaths within 72 hours of receiving a COVID vaccine are significantly underreported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC ) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
As of July 9, the number of reported deaths in the VAERS was 10,991. Of those, 4,593 occurred within 72 hours of vaccination.
The whistleblower – a computer programmer who has developed more than 100 different health care fraud algorithms and has expertise in health care data analysis that allows him to access Medicare and Medicaid data obtained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Systems (CMS) – filed an affidavit under penalty of perjury and claimed that the true number of COVID vaccine-related deaths is closer to 45,000. We are only talking about the cases in America.
The whistleblower claimed that VAERS, while extremely useful, is underreported by a conservative factor of at least five.
In her statement she said:
“As of July 9, 2021, there were 9,048 deaths reported in VAERS. I verified these figures by collecting all data from VAERS itself and not relying on a third party to report them.
At the same time, I requested data from CMS medical claims related to vaccines and patient deaths and found that deaths within 3 days of vaccination were higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000. Put into perspective, the swine flu vaccine was withdrawn from the market, resulting in only 53 deaths.”
AFLDS (America’s Frontline Doctors) said the findings were shocking and that informed consent is impossible if safety data is not accurate.
In a press release, AFLDS said:
“It is unlawful and unconstitutional to administer experimental drugs to individuals who cannot make an informed decision on an independent basis about the true benefits and risks of the vaccine. They must be of the age or ability to make informed decisions and have been given all the information about the risks/benefits necessary to make an informed decision.”
One of the named plaintiffs, Deborah Sobczak, the mother of a 15- and 17-year-old, said in the press release:
“My child will not be the subject of an experiment. What kind of monsters are we letting control us? Perfectly healthy children have developed heart inflammation, brain hemorrhage and even died! I have had enough. I will not sacrifice my child so that a pharmaceutical company can experiment on her. This madness has to stop.”
There is no emergency justifying EUA of COVID vaccines, plaintiffs claim
According to the complaint, on February 4, 2020, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), named as one of the defendants in the lawsuit, declared, in accordance with § 360bbb-3(b)(1)(C ) , that SARS-CoV-2 caused a “public health emergency.”
This initial emergency declaration has been renewed repeatedly and remains in effect to this day. EUA allowed mass use of the vaccines by the American public prior to completion of the standard clinical trial regime and FDA approval.
Plaintiffs claim that the emergency declaration and its multiple extensions are unlawful because there is no underlying emergency. Using HHS COVID mortality data, SARS CoV-2 has an overall survival rate of 99.8% worldwide, rising to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70. This is consistent with seasonal influenza, the complaint states. The mortality rate is 0.15%. Anything but a reason for any kind of emergency, panic or vaccine.
Plaintiffs allege that HHS intentionally inflated data on COVID cases
Plaintiffs allege that HHS’s data was intentionally inflated. On March 24, 2020, HHS amended the rules applicable to coroners and others responsible for preparing death certificates and determining the “cause of death” exclusively for COVID.
The rule change reads, “COVID-19 must be listed on the death certificate for all deceased persons in whom the disease caused or is believed to have caused or contributed to death.”
This is very wrong if you think about it for a moment.
According to the complaint, HHS statistics showed that 95% of deaths classified as “COVID-19 deaths” involved an average of 4 severe underlying conditions. Plaintiffs claim that the CDC knew that the rules for coding and selecting the underlying cause of death would result in COVID being the underlying cause more often than not. Logically, the flu does the same thing and that fact has been heavily abused.
Plaintiffs said the actual number of COVID cases is also much lower than the reported number because of the emergency use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests , which are used as diagnostic tools for COVID. The PCR tests are themselves experimental products, approved by the FDA under separate EUAs. The package inserts state that PCR tests should not be used to diagnose COVID.
The complaint alleges that the manner in which the PCR tests are administered knowingly guarantees an unacceptably high rate of false positives.
COVID vaccine risks not disclosed and underreported
AFLDS medico-legal researchers analyzed the COVID vaccine risk data collected and found migration of the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into the body. Yet vaccines were authorized without any research showing where the spike proteins moved in the body after vaccination, how long they remain active and what effect they have, the complaint said.
AFLDS researchers analyzed VAERS and found an increased risk of death from COVID vaccines. The database indicated that vaccine deaths in the first quarter of 2021 represented a year-on-year increase from 12,000% to 25,000%. The dot is not a comma. So 12 thousand and 25 thousand.
From 2009 to 2019, according to the motion, there were 1529 reported deaths related to all vaccines reported to VAERS. In the first quarter of 2021, there were over 4,000 reported deaths, with 99% of all reported vaccine deaths in 2021 attributed to the COVID vaccine. Only 1% were attributed to other vaccines in the system.
Plaintiffs also revealed evidence of reproductive harm, vascular disease, autoimmune disease, neurological harm, and they highlighted an increased risk of harm to children with COVID vaccines to support their position.
Why the secrecy surrounding V-Safe data?
The complaint drew attention to the secrecy surrounding the CDC’s V-Safe system. That’s a parallel system used to track reported adverse events through a smartphone app managed exclusively by the CDC.
Plaintiffs expressed concern that the information in V-Safe exceeds that in VAERS. They claim VAERS is inaccurate because it may cover less than 1% of all vaccine adverse events, and the federal government does not provide data from other monitoring sources such as V-Safe, CMS, and the military.
Plaintiffs stated informed consent cannot be given without understanding the risks. They said they could not question why HHS would not make critical information related to risks from its reporting systems public, “especially in light of the fact that they have had the time and resources to make the authorizations on the vaccines, build a huge machine for marketing vaccines, and roll out vaccine clinics across the country.”
Many people and groups are filing lawsuits worldwide. Not only ordinary lawsuits but also class-action lawsuits and RICO lawsuits are being prepared. A RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act is a United States federal law that provides for extensive criminal penalties and a civil action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. Prior to RICO, for example, a person who ordered someone else to commit murder could be exempt from prosecution because he did not personally commit the crime.
More and more scientists are standing up. This is not without danger to themselves. They are standing up for us because they are good people and we must, right now, keep our backs straight for them and peremptorily refuse to participate in this nonsense. Dangerous nonsense unfortunately that drags many people into a ridiculous story.