Embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used to obtain embryo cells, nor can embryos obtained from abortion through the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated with microorganisms.”
“To obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used, nor can those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms.”
“The correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be guaranteed.”
“In either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture a programmed abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting it while still alive, in order to remove tissues to be placed in culture media.”
“Given these premises, we face the dilemma of whether the deliberate systematic destruction of a human creature to obtain cell material can be justified, when it is recognized that this is of great interest to fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human diseases. Are research and diagnosis of such great value that they justify the destruction of human beings?”
“The Geneva Declaration affirms that the doctor has the duty to take the greatest care to safeguard the life of a human being from its conception and will not, even under threat, use his knowledge to infringe humanitarian laws.” (1986-04-26; Herranz, Gonzalo; Il Sabato, no.15…Professor Herranz was, at the time, president of the Committee of Medical Ethics of Spanish Doctors and vice-president of the Permanent Committee of Medical Ethics of the European Community.)
What exactly happened in 1972 or 1973, in the Netherlands, where an infant girl was aborted, and her kidneys used to make a cell line that would be used, going forward, in the testing of vaccines?
writes Jon Rappoport.
That cell line is called HEK 293 (HEK stands for human embryonic kidney), and it has been used to test COVID vaccines.
I have already provided evidence to support the conclusion that abortion involved removing the living child from the mother’s womb and taking her kidneys, thus killing her naturally.
This evidence rests on the understanding that in order to extract viable and usable kidney tissue, the baby had to have a functioning blood supply, which meant she was alive.
But the evidence comes ALSO from the knowledge that many other abortions have been performed, to harvest tissue for medical research, by killing living babies.
I found a very informative article (02/09/2021) at the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, by Christian Hacking, entitled, “What the HEK?!” by Christian Hacking. Quotes from the article:
“HEK 293 is a human cell line created using a kidney from a dissected unborn baby in the Netherlands between 1972 and 1973. It is the second most common cell line and is used extensively in “pharmaceutical and biomedical research”. It is also used in vaccine creation and cancer research.”
“It was used, along with other human cell lines, to develop a genetically engineered spike protein (what the mRNA vaccine codes for) in the original development phase of the vaccine. Pfizer’s “new technology” vaccine and the Moderna vaccine were tested on HEK 293 before they began trials on humans. These tests are continuing for all new batches. Finally, the “old technology” vaccine Oxford AstraZeneca grew an attenuated viral strain in HEK 293 cell culture…”
“The kidney in question was dissected from a healthy Dutch baby girl of unknown origin by the team at Leiden University in the Netherlands in 1972. Despite the mention of the term ’embryonic’ in the title, the baby in question was probably 12-13 weeks old when she was killed to provide functioning kidney cells. The man responsible for the research was named Alex Jan Van der Eb; he is still alive and based in the Netherlands.”
“When questioned by the FDA in 2001, Van der Eb confirmed that it was an intentional abortion of a fetus, but he gave vague details about the exact experiments.
“”So the kidney material, the fetal kidney material was as follows: the kidney of the fetus, with an unknown family history, was probably obtained in 1972. The exact date is no longer known. The fetus, as far as I can remember, was perfectly normal. There was nothing wrong with it. The reasons for the abortion were unknown to me. I probably knew it at the time, but it’s been lost, all this information”.”
Author Hacking continues: “…extracting and growing live cells is incredibly difficult. To give yourself the best chance of success, you have to make sure the child is healthy, fresh, intact and sterile. As an embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy confirms:
”To preserve 95% of the cells, the live tissue should be preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion. Within an hour, the cells would deteriorate further, rendering the specimens unusable.”
[This statement was made by “Dr. C Ward Kischer, embryologist and professor emeritus of anatomy; specialist in human embryology, University of Arizona College of Medicine…].” [My comment: This suggests that the abortion, in Holland, in 1972, was planned and technicians were ready. I would say that, to ensure tissue viability, the child had a functioning blood supply and was alive when her kidneys were removed, killing her].Hacking: “To ensure optimal organ viability, the child should be dissected and the organs removed within 5 minutes of delivery. Anesthesia also cannot be used so as not to alter the cellular activity of the organs the researcher wants to obtain.”
“The renowned doctor Ian Donald, the pioneer of the ultrasonic scanner, also claims to have witnessed the WI-38 [another cell line] dissections [1962], conducted at the Karolinska Institute; he described them as follows:
“Experiments were conducted on almost living aborted babies who were not even given the grace of an anesthetic while they wriggled and cried in agony, and when their usefulness had expired, they were executed and thrown away like garbage.
“In his book, ‘The Fetus As Transplant Donor the Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives,’ immunologist Dr. Peter McCullagh provides detailed descriptions of the methods used on dozens of ‘fetal tissue donors’ beginning in the 1970s, including the death of babies between 7 and 26 weeks of gestation by decapitation, exposure, dissection, and drug testing. Gynecologist and ex-abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathanson, reflecting his own understanding of abortion, and citing McCullagh’s book, claims that the Swedish experiments took place as follows:
“…in Sweden they punctured the amniotic sac of a pregnant woman at let’s say 14 to 16 weeks, and then they put a clamp on the baby’s head, pull the head down into the neck of the uterus, drill a hole in the baby’s head, and then put a suction machine in the brain and suck out the brain cells….. Healthy human fetuses from 7 to 21 weeks of legal abortions were used. This is in Sweden. Conception age was estimated from the length of the crown and so on. The fetal liver and kidneys were quickly removed and weighed. At 21 weeks, or 18 weeks, or 16 weeks, a so-called prostaglandin abortion was performed. They injected a substance into the uterus. The woman would then go into mini-birth and deliver the baby. 50% of the time the baby was born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They simply opened the baby’s abdomen, without anesthesia, and took out the liver and kidneys, etc.
“A June 1952 University of Toronto research paper on the methodology of their experiments suggests that these techniques were universal with scientists working in close proximity to the abortions.”
“No macerated [softened after death] specimens were used, and in many of the embryos the heart was still beating at the time of receipt in the virus laboratory.”
“According to Gonzalo Herranz, former head of the Committee on Medical Ethics of Spanish physicians, the best way to prevent ‘contamination by microorganisms’ is to give birth to the child by cesarean section or removal of the uterus.”
“A 1982 review of the history of tissue donation confirms this, and much of the above evidence:”
“Fetal tissue for transplantation should be ‘harvested’ within a few minutes of delivery. Ideally, this should be done by hysterectomy, where the fetus is delivered in utero. Drugs that reduce the physiological activity of the fetus should be avoided. The fetus is therefore in as alive and conscious a state as possible when it is opened.”
It is clear from Hacking’s article how the standard procedure of infanticide is carried out.
It is entirely reasonable to assume that the fetal cell line HEK 293, used for testing the COVID vaccine, was originally, in 1972, produced by the murder of an infant. Refusal to take a COVID vaccine on grounds of conscience and religion is more than justified.
Given the weight of circumstantial evidence, I would say that for all people of faith, refusal is essential.
Insane medical killers and their supporters will say anything to avoid the question of guilt and the application of true justice to themselves. They will invent “science” and cast it in humanitarian terms. They will claim that the end justifies the means. They will engage in gross forgery to pretend that those ends are vital.
But we don’t have to passively watch and believe them.
Billions of believing people can oppose them.
